| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <53398FE6.1090203@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:55:18 +0200 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...aro.org>, Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHC 0/3] sched/idle : find the idlest cpu with cpuidle info On 03/31/2014 03:52 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 28 March 2014 13:29, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote: >> The following patchset provides an interaction between cpuidle and the scheduler. >> >> The first patch encapsulate the needed information for the scheduler in a >> separate cpuidle structure. The second one stores the pointer to this structure >> when entering idle. The third one, use this information to take the decision to >> find the idlest cpu. >> >> After some basic testing with hackbench, it appears there is an improvement for >> the performances (small) and for the duration of the idle states (which provides >> a better power saving). >> >> The measurement has been done with the 'idlestat' tool previously posted in this >> mailing list. >> >> So the benefit is good for both sides performance and power saving. > > Hi Daniel, > > I have looked at your results and i'm a bit surprised that you have so > much time in C-state with a test that involved 400 tasks on a dual > cores HT system. You shouldn't have any CPUs in idle state when > running hackbench; the total time of core0state in C7-IVB is > 87932131.00(us), which is quite huge for a bench that runs 44sec. Or > i'm doing something wrong in the interpretation of the results ? No, actually I mixed the output of hackbench without being run with idlestat or with idlestat. The hackbench's results below are without idlestat. The idlestat results are consistent and effectively it adds a non negligeable overhead as it impacts the hackbench results. So to summarize, hackbench has been run 4 times. 1, 2 : without idlestat, with and without the patchset - hackbench results ~42 secs 3, 4 : with idlestat, with and without the patchset - hackbench results ~87 secs At the first the glance, the results are consistent but I will double check them. Do you have a suggestion for a benchmarking program ? Thanks ! -- Daniel >> The select_idle_sibling could be also improved in the same way. >> >> ====================== test with hackbench 3.14-rc8 ========================= >> >> /usr/bin/hackbench -l 10000 -s 4096 >> >> Running in process mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each (== 400 tasks) >> Each sender will pass 10000 messages of 4096 bytes >> >> Time: 44.433 >> >> Total trace buffer: 1846688 kB >> clusterA@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> core0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 1396 87932131.00 62988.63 0.00 320146.00 >> cpu0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 1 14.00 14.00 14.00 14.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 1 262.00 262.00 262.00 262.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 1180 87938177.00 74523.88 1.00 320147.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu0 wakeups name count >> irq009 acpi 1 >> cpu1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 475 87941356.00 185139.70 322.00 1500690.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu1 wakeups name count >> irq009 acpi 3 >> core1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu2@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 11 288157.00 26196.09 16.00 200060.00 >> C1E-VB 6 221601.00 36933.50 79.00 200066.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 950 87417466.00 92018.39 19.00 200074.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 2 34.00 17.00 11.00 23.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 745 18800.00 25.23 2.00 156.00 >> cpu2 wakeups name count >> irq019 ahci 50 >> irq009 acpi 17 >> cpu3@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu3 wakeups name count >> >> ================ test with hackbench 3.14-rc8 + patchset ==================== >> >> /usr/bin/hackbench -l 10000 -s 4096 >> >> Running in process mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each (== 400 tasks) >> Each sender will pass 10000 messages of 4096 bytes >> >> Time: 42.179 >> >> Total trace buffer: 1846688 kB >> clusterA@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> core0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 880 89157590.00 101315.44 0.00 400184.00 >> cpu0@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 1 233.00 233.00 233.00 233.00 >> C3-IVB 1 260.00 260.00 260.00 260.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 700 89162006.00 127374.29 182.00 400187.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu0 wakeups name count >> irq009 acpi 2 >> cpu1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 334 89164805.00 266960.49 1.00 1500677.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu1 wakeups name count >> irq009 acpi 6 >> core1@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu2@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 19 2169047.00 114160.37 18.00 999129.00 >> C1E-IB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 376 86993307.00 231365.18 20.00 1500682.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu2 wakeups name count >> irq009 acpi 32 >> irq019 ahci 45 >> cpu3@...te hits total(us) avg(us) min(us) max(us) >> POLL 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C1E-VB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C3-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C6-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> C7-IVB 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1701 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1700 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1600 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1500 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1400 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1300 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1200 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1100 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 1000 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 900 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 800 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> 782 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 >> cpu3 wakeups name count >> >> >> Daniel Lezcano (3): >> cpuidle: encapsulate power info in a separate structure >> idle: store the idle state the cpu is >> sched/fair: use the idle state info to choose the idlest cpu >> >> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 6 +- >> arch/arm/mach-exynos/cpuidle.c | 4 +- >> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 4 +- >> drivers/base/power/domain.c | 6 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c | 4 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-big_little.c | 9 +-- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-calxeda.c | 6 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c | 4 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-powernv.c | 8 +-- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-pseries.c | 12 ++-- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c | 14 ++--- >> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-zynq.c | 4 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/driver.c | 6 +- >> drivers/cpuidle/governors/ladder.c | 14 +++-- >> drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c | 8 +-- >> drivers/cpuidle/sysfs.c | 2 +- >> drivers/idle/intel_idle.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++----------------- >> include/linux/cpuidle.h | 10 ++- >> kernel/sched/fair.c | 46 ++++++++++++-- >> kernel/sched/idle.c | 17 +++++- >> kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 ++ >> 21 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 1.7.9.5 >> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists