[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140401023944.GQ25953@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 22:39:44 -0400
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...stprotocols.net, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jmario@...hat.com, fowles@...each.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] perf: Allow ability to map cpus to nodes easily
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 06:10:33PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > +/* Determine highest possible node in the system for sparse allocation */
> > +static void set_max_node_num(void)
> > +{
> > + FILE *fp;
> > + int ret = -1;
> > +
> > + /* set up default */
> > + max_node_num = 8;
> > +
> > + /* get the highest possible cpu number for a sparse allocation */
> > + fp = fopen("/sys/devices/system/node/possible", "r");
> > + if (!fp)
> > + goto out;
>
> any reason why not put fopen/fclose into __set_max_num ?
I either had to pass in a path string pointer or a file pointer, I just
chose a file pointer. Thought it fit with the rest of perf passing FPs
around. :-D It doesn't matter to me either way.
>
> also looks like 'get_max_num' would fit better for __set_max_num ;-)
Yeah, I split it out based on your suggestion and didn't realize the
details kinda changed.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists