linux-kernel - liblockdep soname versioning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+5PVA67oBeHUiPXj0viNgrX+uDnJ9LsZSPXF1cLt_D511KKtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 1 Apr 2014 08:56:08 -0400
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: liblockdep soname versioning

Hi Sasha,

We've had a request [1] to package up liblockdep in Fedora.  Looking
things over, I noticed the library isn't actually versioned at all and
instead just builds a plain .so file.  That's likely fine during
development of it, but if distros are to ship it for broader use then
it would be a good idea to specify the soname and use a versioned .so.

The makefile already has LIBLOCKDEP_VERSION defined.  Would it be
possible to use this as the soname and version number?  Then
liblockdep.so could be the normal symlink to the versioned .so
(liblockdep.so.0.0.1 in this case).

Thanks.

josh

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082763
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/