[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <533ABCCB.4090502@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 09:19:07 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
CC: "Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: liblockdep soname versioning
On 04/01/2014 08:56 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
>
> We've had a request [1] to package up liblockdep in Fedora. Looking
> things over, I noticed the library isn't actually versioned at all and
> instead just builds a plain .so file. That's likely fine during
> development of it, but if distros are to ship it for broader use then
> it would be a good idea to specify the soname and use a versioned .so.
>
> The makefile already has LIBLOCKDEP_VERSION defined. Would it be
> possible to use this as the soname and version number? Then
> liblockdep.so could be the normal symlink to the versioned .so
> (liblockdep.so.0.0.1 in this case).
>
> Thanks.
>
> josh
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082763
>
Sure! I never expected it to live outside the kernel tree as a separate
package, but I'm happy to accommodate for that.
I think that I'll just match the version number with the kernel version
since what mostly matters is what you have in kernel/lockdep.c, so for
example, right now we'll have 'liblockdep.so.3.15.0'. Sounds good?
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists