[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140401132156.GB27586@MrMyself>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 21:21:57 +0800
From: Nicolin Chen <Guangyu.Chen@...escale.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <timur@...i.org>,
<Li.Xiubo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bisect 2/2] ASoC: fsl_sai: Separately enable interrupts
for Tx and Rx streams
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun
> > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did,
> > enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the
> > opposite direction will not break the current stream.
>
> This still doesn't apply against fsl-sai (nor for-next).
Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing
two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and
"ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could
not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the
patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag".
What should I do now?
Thank you,
Nicolin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists