[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1396385391.23763.30.camel@x220>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 22:49:51 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, ak@...ux.intel.com,
gleb@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, hubicka@....cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, perex@...ex.cz, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 LTO changes for v3.15
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 14:05 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/init.h
> +++ b/include/linux/init.h
> @@ -163,6 +163,23 @@ extern bool initcall_debug;
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LTO
I can't find a Kconfig symbol LTO nor a preprocessor define for
CONFIG_LTO. (I only checked master of Linus's tree and linux-next.)
Why is this check for CONFIG_LTO needed?
> +/* Work around a LTO gcc problem: when there is no reference to a variable
> + * in a module it will be moved to the end of the program. This causes
> + * reordering of initcalls which the kernel does not like.
> + * Add a dummy reference function to avoid this. The function is
> + * deleted by the linker.
> + */
> +#define LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL(x) \
> + ; /* yes this is needed */ \
> + static __used __exit void *reference_##x(void) \
> + { \
> + return &x; \
> + }
> +#else
> +#define LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL(x)
> +#endif
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists