[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyQHdtgQpnS7ar2db5QoZhmMStH_LgxHvAaCUbVEx_PQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:35:05 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 LTO changes for v3.15
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> Why would they break tracing? I remember there was a issue with compat
> calls, are these related to that?
They "break" tracing by being invisible to syscall tracing. As you
really should know ;)
The syscall tracing feature depends on the wrappers that
SYSCALL_DEFINEx() creates. See the SYSCALL_TRACE_ENTER_EVENT() etc
crud in <linux/syscalls.h>
So there's no SYSCALL_METADATA for those system calls that weren't
created with the proper SYSCALL_DEFINE() wrappers.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists