[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140401200145.05e0437e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 20:01:45 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 LTO changes for v3.15
On Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:54:23 -0700
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 03/31/2014 05:33 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > I notice that there seems to be a handful of x86 system calls that
> > don't use the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros to define the system call, some
> > grepping finds at least ioperm(), modify_ldt(), sigreturn() and
> > rt_sigreturn(). There are probably others. They should just be
> > converted to SYSCALL_DEFINEx() while at it. No, x86 doesn't need the
> > typecasting, but it won't hurt either, and it's good to be consistent.
> >
> > I'm not sure why those system calls didn't get converted (other
> > x86-specific ones like vm86() _have_ gotten converted), maybe there's
> > some reason for it. But I *think* the reason is "nobody noticed".
> >
>
> Pretty much. If nothing else, it breaks tracing.
Why would they break tracing? I remember there was a issue with compat
calls, are these related to that?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists