[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140402135812.GI3339@pcnci.linuxbox.cz>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:58:12 +0200
From: Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: "Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
Subject: Re: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?
Hi Tomas,
bad news, we just had failed boot with 3.10.35 with your patch:
last line was:
mei_me 0000:00:16.0: wait hw ready failed. status = -110
so it can probably happen that boot hangs on mei_me init attempt..
colleague just told me it also happened to him with 3.13 kernel,
however I don't have more info on that case..
if I can provide more information, please let me know.
BR
nik
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 12:05:20PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Tomas,
> >
> > > If this is a server platform can you please try this patch
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/396
> >
> > tried 3.10.35 with Your patch and now I can see following in dmesg:
> >
> > [ +0.000290] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: Device doesn't have valid ME Interface
> > [ +0.007656] mei_me 0000:00:16.0: initialization failed.
> >
> > now reboot works as expected. Once this hits ustream (if it hasn't already),
> > this could go to -stable, do You agree?
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> I definitely asked for adding it to stable. Would you wish to add you tested-by to the patch?.
> Tomas
>
>
--
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28.rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava
tel.: +420 591 166 214
fax: +420 596 621 273
mobil: +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz
mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@...uxbox.cz
-------------------------------------
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists