linux-kernel - RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B1AFB112D@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2014 14:27:02 +0000
From:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
To:	Nikola Ciprich <nikola.ciprich@...uxbox.cz>
CC:	"Greg KH (gregkh@...uxfoundation.org)" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: 3.0 -> 3.10 regression? poweroff instead of reboot?



> 
> Hi Tomas,
> 
> bad news, we just had failed boot with 3.10.35 with your patch:
> 
> last line was:
> 
> mei_me 0000:00:16.0: wait hw ready failed. status = -110
> 
> so it can probably happen that boot hangs on mei_me init attempt..
> 
> colleague just told me it also happened to him with 3.13 kernel,
> however I don't have more info on that case..
> 
> if I can provide more information, please let me know.
>
I would need the devices ids of the MEI device on your platform (lspci  will do the job), is this same platform as you tested before? 
You should not get to requesting the HW readiness w/ my patch. 
Thanks
Tomas
 
-----------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/