lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4QV-=kWhzxqq4F-mZ2puh--SPydR+HmbLvoCixiJ_c6=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:18:29 +0200
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
	Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@...ah.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ryan Lortie <desrt@...rt.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] shm: add memfd_create() syscall

Hi

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:06 PM, David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com> wrote:
>> memfd_create() is similar to mmap(MAP_ANON), but returns a file-descriptor
>> that you can pass to mmap(). It explicitly allows sealing and
>> avoids any connection to user-visible mount-points. Thus, it's not
>> subject to quotas on mounted file-systems, but can be used like
>> malloc()'ed memory, but with a file-descriptor to it.
>>
>> memfd_create() does not create a front-FD, but instead returns the raw
>> shmem file, so calls like ftruncate() can be used. Also calls like fstat()
>> will return proper information and mark the file as regular file. Sealing
>> is explicitly supported on memfds.
>>
>> Compared to O_TMPFILE, it does not require a tmpfs mount-point and is not
>> subject to quotas and alike.
>
> Instead of adding new syscall we can extend existing openat() a little
> bit more:
>
> openat(AT_FDSHM, "name", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0666)

O_TMPFILE requires an existing directory as "name". So you have to use:
  open("/run/", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0666)
instead of
  open("/run/new_file", O_TMPFILE | O_RDWR, 0666)

We _really_ want to set a name for the inode, though. Otherwise,
debug-info via /proc/pid/fd/ is useless.

Furthermore, Linus requested to allow sealing only on files that
_explicitly_ allow sealing. So v2 of this series will have
MFD_ALLOW_SEALING as memfd_create() flag. I don't think we can do this
with linkat() (or is that meant to be implicit for the new AT_FDSHM?).
Last but not least, you now need a separate syscall to set the
file-size.

I could live with most of these issues, except for the name-thing. Ideas?

Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ