linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] x86 LTO changes for v3.15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2014 10:10:12 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@....cz>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 LTO changes for v3.15

On 04/02/2014 05:33 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Apr 2014 17:35:05 -0700
> 
> Heh, I know that not having the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() wrappers means that
> they wont be traced. I must have misunderstood Peter, as I thought he
> meant if we added SYSCALL_DEFINEx(), that they would break tracing.
> 

No, I meant that them being missing breaks tracing.

> 
> Yeah, adding the SYSCALL_DEFINEx() macros around those functions would
> be good for tracing as well.
> 
> Glad I understand you two now ;-)
> 

:)

Do you want to do the patch?

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/