linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct tracepoint

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140403145441.2ca44063@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:54:41 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct
 tracepoint

On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:49:54 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:


> So my current thinking is that the pre-existing code was erroneously
> enabling tracepoints with the name of every event enabled (including
> e.g. function tracer, kprobes, etc). It was not failing because
> tracepoint.c silently accepted to enable tracepoints were not loaded
> yet.
> 

If that was true, than wouldn't the error code I added have returned an
error?

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/