linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwM0aG1PHY7xOQbsFG+Ot4mL4=7yRnT7dssUaOyaLQ3GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:34:05 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] cgroup changes for v3.15-rc1

On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> I'll try to pick kernels away from that, but that makes bisection much
> less effective.

Ok, I think I'm away from the broken region. The problem seems to be in between

good: 8e30e2b8ba0e ("cgroup: restructure locking and error handling in
cgroup_mount()")

bad: 6f30558f37bf ("cgroup: make cgroup hold onto its kernfs_node")

and let's see what bisect says about the rest.. Does that give you any ideas?

            Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/