[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140405011332.GR32556@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 18:13:32 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Bächler <thomas@...hlinux.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpowa@...hlinux.org
Subject: Re: 3.13: <module> disagrees about version of symbol <symbol>
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:38:10AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 01.04.2014 01:34, schrieb Andi Kleen:
> >> This problem persists in v3.14, i.e. I still have to revert
> >> 83460ec8dcac14142e7860a01fa59c267ac4657c in order to get a working
> >> kernel on i686. I would really appreciate if someone would actually read
> >> my original mail from about 3 months ago and write an answer.
> >
> > Can you resend it please?
>
> It's available here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/26/22
>
> For convenience, here is a copy-and-paste of the full text:
I did some experiments know and I can't find any 32bit modules
that do not load with 32bit MODVERSIONS on or off with
a current tree.
Do you have a specific config?
Specific compiler version?
Thanks,
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists