[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5340134B.4010705@archlinux.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:29:31 +0200
From: Thomas Bächler <thomas@...hlinux.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tpowa@...hlinux.org
Subject: Re: 3.13: <module> disagrees about version of symbol <symbol>
Am 05.04.2014 03:13, schrieb Andi Kleen:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:38:10AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 01.04.2014 01:34, schrieb Andi Kleen:
>>>> This problem persists in v3.14, i.e. I still have to revert
>>>> 83460ec8dcac14142e7860a01fa59c267ac4657c in order to get a working
>>>> kernel on i686. I would really appreciate if someone would actually read
>>>> my original mail from about 3 months ago and write an answer.
>>>
>>> Can you resend it please?
>>
>> It's available here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/26/22
>>
>> For convenience, here is a copy-and-paste of the full text:
>
> I did some experiments know and I can't find any 32bit modules
> that do not load with 32bit MODVERSIONS on or off with
> a current tree.
>
> Do you have a specific config?
> Specific compiler version?
Using gcc 4.8 from Arch Linux with the configuration at [1] and Linux 3.14.
[1]
https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/config?h=packages/linux
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists