[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140406222737.GA26274@arm.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2014 23:27:39 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix !CONFIG_COMPAT build failures
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> Recent arm64 builds using CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES are failing with:
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c: In function ‘perf_reg_abi’:
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c:41:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘is_compat_thread’
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c:1398:2: error: unknown type name ‘compat_uptr_t’
>
> This is due to some recent arm64 perf commits with compat support:
>
> commit 23c7d70d55c6d9:
> ARM64: perf: add support for frame pointer unwinding in compat mode
>
> commit 2ee0d7fd36a3f8:
> ARM64: perf: add support for perf registers API
>
> Those patches make the arm64 kernel unbuildable if CONFIG_COMPAT is not
> defined and CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES depends on !CONFIG_COMPAT. This patch
> allows the arm64 kernel to build with and without CONFIG_COMPAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Thanks. Applied.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists