[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1kn+dMwMVrU1avLqe+PzQ6FvLSdVb7cf_uZF5_Pqw1yug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:04:28 +0200
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix !CONFIG_COMPAT build failures
On 7 April 2014 00:27, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 03:25:49PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
>> Recent arm64 builds using CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES are failing with:
>>
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c: In function 'perf_reg_abi':
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c:41:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_compat_thread'
>>
>> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c:1398:2: error: unknown type name 'compat_uptr_t'
>>
>> This is due to some recent arm64 perf commits with compat support:
>>
>> commit 23c7d70d55c6d9:
>> ARM64: perf: add support for frame pointer unwinding in compat mode
>>
>> commit 2ee0d7fd36a3f8:
>> ARM64: perf: add support for perf registers API
>>
>> Those patches make the arm64 kernel unbuildable if CONFIG_COMPAT is not
>> defined and CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES depends on !CONFIG_COMPAT. This patch
>> allows the arm64 kernel to build with and without CONFIG_COMPAT.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
>
> Thanks. Applied.
Thanks for tracking the problem!
Jean
>
> --
> Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists