linux-kernel - [PATCHv2 1/1] staging: sep: Fix coding style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1396799011.1468.12.camel@vash.home>
Date:	Sun, 06 Apr 2014 17:43:31 +0200
From:	Gmail <camille.bordignon@...il.com>
To:	"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"rashika.kheria@...il.com" <rashika.kheria@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/1] staging: sep: Fix coding style

This fixes coding style warning "Missing a blank line after
declarations" in files sep_dev.h and sep_crypto.c (linux-next).

Sorry for the previous mail, tabs all got converted into spaces due to
gmail webclient ... (thanks Greg).

Signed-off-by: Camille Bordignon <camille.bordignon@...il.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_crypto.c
b/drivers/staging/sep/sep_crypto.c
index 965485f..415f8ec 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_crypto.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sep/sep_crypto.c
@@ -93,6 +93,7 @@ static void sep_do_callback(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct sep_work_struct *sep_work = container_of(work,
 		struct sep_work_struct, work);
+
 	if (sep_work != NULL) {
 		(sep_work->callback)(sep_work->data);
 		kfree(sep_work);
@@ -649,6 +650,7 @@ weak:
 static u32 sep_sg_nents(struct scatterlist *sg)
 {
 	u32 ct1 = 0;
+
 	while (sg) {
 		ct1 += 1;
 		sg = sg_next(sg);
@@ -666,6 +668,7 @@ static u32 sep_sg_nents(struct scatterlist *sg)
 static u32 sep_start_msg(struct this_task_ctx *ta_ctx)
 {
 	u32 *word_ptr;
+
 	ta_ctx->msg_len_words = 2;
 	ta_ctx->msgptr = ta_ctx->msg;
 	memset(ta_ctx->msg, 0, SEP_DRIVER_MESSAGE_SHARED_AREA_SIZE_IN_BYTES);
@@ -740,6 +743,7 @@ static void sep_write_msg(struct this_task_ctx
*ta_ctx, void *in_addr,
 {
 	u32 *word_ptr;
 	void *void_ptr;
+
 	void_ptr = ta_ctx->msgptr + *msg_offset;
 	word_ptr = (u32 *)void_ptr;
 	memcpy(void_ptr, in_addr, size);
@@ -748,6 +752,7 @@ static void sep_write_msg(struct this_task_ctx
*ta_ctx, void *in_addr,
 	/* Do we need to manipulate endian? */
 	if (byte_array) {
 		u32 i;
+
 		for (i = 0; i < ((size + 3) / 4); i += 1)
 			*(word_ptr + i) = CHG_ENDIAN(*(word_ptr + i));
 	}
@@ -788,12 +793,14 @@ static void sep_read_msg(struct this_task_ctx
*ta_ctx, void *in_addr,
 {
 	u32 *word_ptr;
 	void *void_ptr;
+
 	void_ptr = ta_ctx->msgptr + *msg_offset;
 	word_ptr = (u32 *)void_ptr;
 
 	/* Do we need to manipulate endian? */
 	if (byte_array) {
 		u32 i;
+
 		for (i = 0; i < ((size + 3) / 4); i += 1)
 			*(word_ptr + i) = CHG_ENDIAN(*(word_ptr + i));
 	}
@@ -865,6 +872,7 @@ static void sep_read_context(struct this_task_ctx
*ta_ctx, u32 *msg_offset,
 	void *dst, u32 len)
 {
 	u32 max_length = ((len + 3) / sizeof(u32)) * sizeof(u32);
+
 	sep_read_msg(ta_ctx, dst, len, max_length, msg_offset, 0);
 }
 
@@ -884,6 +892,7 @@ static void sep_write_context(struct this_task_ctx
*ta_ctx, u32 *msg_offset,
 	void *src, u32 len)
 {
 	u32 max_length = ((len + 3) / sizeof(u32)) * sizeof(u32);
+
 	sep_write_msg(ta_ctx, src, len, max_length, msg_offset, 0);
 }
 
@@ -3893,6 +3902,7 @@ static struct crypto_alg crypto_algs[] = {
 int sep_crypto_setup(void)
 {
 	int err, i, j, k;
+
 	tasklet_init(&sep_dev->finish_tasklet, sep_finish,
 		(unsigned long)sep_dev);
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_dev.h
b/drivers/staging/sep/sep_dev.h
index 5f6a07f..bf56c06 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_dev.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/sep/sep_dev.h
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ static inline u32 sep_read_reg(struct sep_device
*dev, int reg)
 static inline void sep_wait_sram_write(struct sep_device *dev)
 {
 	u32 reg_val;
+
 	do {
 		reg_val = sep_read_reg(dev, HW_SRAM_DATA_READY_REG_ADDR);
 	} while (!(reg_val & 1));



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/