| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <645268231.929.1396985754629.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 19:35:54 +0000 (UTC)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct
tracepoint
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...nel.org>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
> "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>, "Johannes Berg"
> <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 1:56:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] Tracepoint: register/unregister struct tracepoint
>
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 10:02:34 -0400
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>
> > Register/unregister tracepoint probes with struct tracepoint pointer
> > rather than tracepoint name.
> >
> > This change, which vastly simplifies tracepoint.c, has been proposed by
> > Steven Rostedt. It also removes 8.8kB (mostly of text) to the vmlinux
> > size.
> >
> > >From this point on, the tracers need to pass a struct tracepoint pointer
> > to probe register/unregister. A probe can now only be connected to a
> > tracepoint that exists. Moreover, tracers are responsible for
> > unregistering the probe before the module containing its associated
> > tracepoint is unloaded.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > CC: Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...hat.com>
> > CC: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/ftrace_event.h | 22 +-
> > include/linux/tracepoint.h | 41 +--
> > include/trace/ftrace.h | 9 +-
> > kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 51 ++--
> > kernel/trace/trace_events_trigger.c | 2 +-
> > kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c | 21 +-
> > kernel/trace/trace_output.c | 2 +-
> > kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 20 +-
> > kernel/tracepoint.c | 509
> > +++++++++++++++--------------------
> > 9 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 349 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > index cdc3011..75e64e8 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/ftrace_event.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #include <linux/percpu.h>
> > #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> > #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> > +#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
> >
> > struct trace_array;
> > struct trace_buffer;
> > @@ -232,6 +233,7 @@ enum {
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_IGNORE_ENABLE_BIT,
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_WAS_ENABLED_BIT,
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER_BIT,
> > + TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT_BIT,
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -244,6 +246,7 @@ enum {
> > * (used for module unloading, if a module event is
> > enabled,
> > * it is best to clear the buffers that used it).
> > * USE_CALL_FILTER - For ftrace internal events, don't use file filter
> > + * TRACEPOINT - Event is a tracepoint
> > */
> > enum {
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED = (1 << TRACE_EVENT_FL_FILTERED_BIT),
> > @@ -252,12 +255,17 @@ enum {
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_IGNORE_ENABLE = (1 << TRACE_EVENT_FL_IGNORE_ENABLE_BIT),
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_WAS_ENABLED = (1 << TRACE_EVENT_FL_WAS_ENABLED_BIT),
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER = (1 <<
> > TRACE_EVENT_FL_USE_CALL_FILTER_BIT),
> > + TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT = (1 << TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT_BIT),
> > };
> >
> > struct ftrace_event_call {
> > struct list_head list;
> > struct ftrace_event_class *class;
> > - char *name;
> > + union {
> > + char *name;
> > + /* Set TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT flag when using "tp" */
> > + struct tracepoint *tp;
> > + };
> > struct trace_event event;
> > const char *print_fmt;
> > struct event_filter *filter;
> > @@ -271,6 +279,7 @@ struct ftrace_event_call {
> > * bit 3: ftrace internal event (do not enable)
> > * bit 4: Event was enabled by module
> > * bit 5: use call filter rather than file filter
> > + * bit 6: Event is a tracepoint
> > */
> > int flags; /* static flags of different events */
> >
> > @@ -283,6 +292,15 @@ struct ftrace_event_call {
> > #endif
> > };
> >
> > +static inline const char *
> > +ftrace_event_get_name(struct ftrace_event_call *call)
>
> I was thinking about this, and it really should be called
> "ftrace_event_name()", the "get" implies that there should be an
> associated "put".
OK. I'll change it.
>
> > +{
> > + if (call->flags & TRACE_EVENT_FL_TRACEPOINT)
> > + return call->tp ? call->tp->name : NULL;
> > + else
> > + return call->name;
> > +}
>
> Also, you missed a bunch of conversions in trace_event.c file. Do a
> search for '->name' and you'll find them. The ones that shouldn't be
> converted are rather obvious (system, field, mod), but you'll see
> others that were missed. I'm a bit nervous about what other ones may be
> missed as well.
Got them. I noticed that I forgot to turn on CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE when
I did the original swap from name to _name to find the sites to update.
I did test more recently with a config that has all the FTRACE and PERF
features enabled, but that was after I swapped back from _name to name,
so I did not catch those two sites.
I just swapped the field name to _name again, and did the build with
all FTRACE and PERF config options enabled to be certain I did not miss
any. Just to be extra sure, I'm doing a make allyesconfig too.
Then, I'm changing _name back to name, and I'll prepare this as v11.
Is that OK with you ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> -- Steve
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists