[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1397140123.5137.99.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 16:28:43 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH RT] rwsem: The return of multi-reader PI rwsems
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 16:18 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 15:19 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > If you have any benchmark on large machines I would be very happy if
> > you could test this patch against the unpatched version of -rt.
>
> Too bad I don't have (and know how to use) specjbb.
>
> I dug up old vmark, thinking I'd be able to get some halfway useful
> relative numbers from it, but that was a waste of a day. The thing
> performs so badly on 40 core box that rt _beats_ nopreempt, and after 2
> nodes, you're going backward. 40 Westmere EX cores does a whopping ~2.5
> * dinky old Q6600 box throughput.
P.S. What I didn't see was any sign of a delta patched/unpatched..
which may mean nothing at all :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists