[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVwTTO43xQb8EiGdN-s8a04qU92p-t-Luo5z6aYVAvZig@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:25:39 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, stable@...per.es
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86-64, modify_ldt: Ban 16-bit segments on
64-bit kernels
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 5:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>> No self modifying code... The far jump must be in the indirect form
>> anyhow. The CS:EIP must be accessible from user mode, but not
>> necessarily from compatibility mode. So the trampoline (the jump)
>> and data (CS:EIP) can live pretty much anywhere in virtual memory.
>> But indeed, I see what you meant now.
>>
>
> This is, in fact, exactly then what I was suggesting, except that data
> is passed directly in memory rather than in a register and letting user
> space sort it out (this could be in the vdso, but the vdso may be > 4 GB
> so it has to be in 64-bit mode until the last instruction.) The
> difference isn't huge; mostly an implementation detail.
I'm a bit confused as to exactly what everyone is suggesting. I don't
think there's any instruction that can do a direct far jump to an
address stored in a register.
ISTM it does matter whether SS or CS is the offending selector. If
it's SS, then the possible trampoline sequences are:
MOV SS, ??? / POP SS / LSS
JMP/RET
or
IRET (!)
If it's CS, then we just need a far JMP or a RET or an IRET. The far
JMP is kind of nice since we can at least use RIP-relative addressing
What are the interrupt shadow rules? I thought IRET did not block interrupts.
>
> A signal arriving while in the user space trampoline could seriously
> complicate life.
Agreed.
Note that we're not really guaranteed to have a trampoline at all.
The vdso isn't there in CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO mode, although the number
of users of this "feature" on OpenSUSE 9 is probably zero.
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists