[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140414110504.GH11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:05:04 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthreads: kill CLONE_KERNEL, change
kernel_thread(kernel_init) to avoid CLONE_SIGHAND
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 09:56:17PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> 1. Remove CLONE_KERNEL, it has no users and it is dangerous.
>
> The (old) comment says "List of flags we want to share for kernel
> threads" but this is not true, we do not want to share ->sighand by
> default. This flag can only be used if the caller is sure that both
> parent/child will never play with signals (say, allow_signal/etc).
>
> 2. Change rest_init() to clone kernel_init() without CLONE_SIGHAND.
>
> In this case CLONE_SIGHAND does not really hurt, and it looks like
> optimization because copy_sighand() can avoid kmem_cache_alloc().
>
> But in fact this only adds the minor pessimization. kernel_init()
> is going to exec the init process, and de_thread() will need to
> unshare ->sighand and do kmem_cache_alloc(sighand_cachep) anyway,
> but it needs to do more work and take tasklist_lock and siglock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Seems good;
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
I'm thinking the idea was for Andrew to pick this up?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists