linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/rcu/tree.c: remove duplicate extern definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJhHMCB5_A8xRHAnpQuTTcc4KhXEiS5Uo+oZEih=cci9H+H79w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:19:31 -0400
From:	Pranith Kumar <pranith@...ech.edu>
To:	Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] kernel/rcu/tree.c: remove duplicate extern definition

Hi Paul,

On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 05:53:53PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> remove duplicate definition of extern resched_cpu
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@...il.com>
>
> Hello, Pranith,
>
> When I apply this patch I get the following:
>
> /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/rcu/tree.c: In function ‘rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs’:
> /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/rcu/tree.c:895:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘resched_cpu’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/rcu/tree.c: At top level:
> /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/rcu/tree.c:1009:13: warning: conflicting types for ‘resched_cpu’ [enabled by default]
> /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/kernel/rcu/tree.c:895:3: note: previous implicit declaration of ‘resched_cpu’ was here
>
> This failed in under number of different Kconfig setups, the .config file
> for one of them is attached.
>
> So this declaration really is needed.  Just out of curiosity, what led
> you to believe that it could be removed?
>

That is strange. The patch removes a duplicate declaration of
resched_cpu (on lines 768, 954) of the file kernel/rcu/tree.c of the
latest git.

The patch compiles fine here with the latest tip of the git tree.

  CC      kernel/rcu/tree.o

Can you please check if your tree.c has two declarations for resched_cpu?

-- 
Pranith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/