linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] pwm_lpss: Add support for PCI devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <604BF5F4C5D71041942BC7E84ED659EA01570E5F@PGSMSX103.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2014 09:06:23 +0000
From:	"Chew, Chiau Ee" <chiau.ee.chew@...el.com>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] pwm_lpss: Add support for PCI devices

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 08:41:02AM +0000, Chew, Chiau Ee wrote:
> >
> >
> > > > +static struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev,
> > > > +			struct resource *r, struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo *info)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm;
> > > > -	struct resource *r;
> > > >  	int ret;
> > > >
> > > > -	lpwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lpwm), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +	lpwm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*lpwm), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > >  	if (!lpwm)
> > > > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > > > -
> > > > -	r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > > > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > >
> > > > -	lpwm->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> > > > +	lpwm->regs = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, r);
> > > >  	if (IS_ERR(lpwm->regs))
> > > > -		return PTR_ERR(lpwm->regs);
> > > > -
> > > > -	lpwm->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > > > -	if (IS_ERR(lpwm->clk)) {
> > > > -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get PWM clock\n");
> > > > -		return PTR_ERR(lpwm->clk);
> > > > +		return lpwm->regs;
> > > > +
> > > > +	if (info) {
> > > > +		lpwm->clk_rate = info->clk_rate;
> > > > +	} else {
> > > > +		lpwm->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > > > +		if (IS_ERR(lpwm->clk)) {
> > > > +			dev_err(dev, "failed to get PWM clock\n");
> > > > +			return (void *)lpwm->clk;
> > >
> > > Why the cast here?
> >
> > Alan, please do correct me if I describe wrongly on the purpose that you add
> the cast here.
> >
> > As you can see, pwm_lpss_probe() is expected to return a pointer of type
> struct pwm_lpss_chip.  On the other hand,
> > the return of devm_clk_get() would be a pointer of type struct clk. So
> > if were to use lpwm->clk as the return value of pwm_lpss_probe() , a cast
> would be needed since the pointer type is different from the expected one. The
> compiler would complain on " warning: return from incompatible pointer type"
> > if without the cast.
> 
> I think you can use ERR_CAST() here.

You are right....ERR_CAST() can be used. 

Ok...i will clean up the patch and resend a v2 version.

Thanks for the review and feedback.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/