lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomvmpiYkQAP7Yb=TNxNsXMVh1_MLuK7KQrdEkf15MyvMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:31:34 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce new cpufreq helper macros

On 16 April 2014 03:55, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
> makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
> use such an iteration procedure.
>
> The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over
> cpufreq_frequency_table across all drivers and cpufreq core.
>
> This was tested on a x86_64 platform.
> Most files compiled successfully but unfortunately I was not
> able to compile sh_sir.c pasemi_cpufreq.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
> due to lack of cross compiler.
>
> Changes v1 -> v2
>         - Rearrange patches
>         - Remove redundant braces
>         - Fix a newly introduced bug in exynos5440
>         - Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry instead of
> cpufreq_for_each_entry in cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index()
>         - Drop redundant double ! operator in longhaul and change

You dropped this !! in thermal stuff and not longhaul :)

> the pos loop cursor variable to freq_pos.
>         - Declare pos variable on a separate line
>
> Stratos Karafotis (8):
>   cpufreq: Introduce macros for cpufreq_frequency_table iteration
>   cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration
>   davinci: da850: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>   mips: lemote 2f: se cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>   mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>   thermal: cpu_cooling: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for
>     iteration
>   irda: sh_sir: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration
>   sh: clk: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ