linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce new cpufreq helper macros

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <534E2B6D.1000902@semaphore.gr>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:04:13 +0300
From:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce new cpufreq helper macros

On 16/04/2014 07:01 πμ, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16 April 2014 03:55, Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This patch set introduces two freq_table helper macros which
>> can be used for iteration over cpufreq_frequency_table and
>> makes the necessary changes to cpufreq core and drivers that
>> use such an iteration procedure.
>>
>> The motivation was a usage of common procedure to iterate over
>> cpufreq_frequency_table across all drivers and cpufreq core.
>>
>> This was tested on a x86_64 platform.
>> Most files compiled successfully but unfortunately I was not
>> able to compile sh_sir.c pasemi_cpufreq.c and ppc_cbe_cpufreq.c
>> due to lack of cross compiler.
>>
>> Changes v1 -> v2
>>         - Rearrange patches
>>         - Remove redundant braces
>>         - Fix a newly introduced bug in exynos5440
>>         - Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry instead of
>> cpufreq_for_each_entry in cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index()
>>         - Drop redundant double ! operator in longhaul and change
> 
> You dropped this !! in thermal stuff and not longhaul :)
> 
>> the pos loop cursor variable to freq_pos.
>>         - Declare pos variable on a separate line
>>
>> Stratos Karafotis (8):
>>   cpufreq: Introduce macros for cpufreq_frequency_table iteration
>>   cpufreq: Use cpufreq_for_each_* macros for frequency table iteration
>>   davinci: da850: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>>   mips: lemote 2f: se cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>>   mfd: db8500-prcmu: Use cpufreq_for_each_entry macro for iteration
>>   thermal: cpu_cooling: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for
>>     iteration
>>   irda: sh_sir: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration
>>   sh: clk: Use cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry macro for iteration
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> 

Thanks!

Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/