[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpok8bLoaC8oo2x_f0cGYCc51Fvnp3Thh0a95BSExvXHDHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:41:32 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Arvind Chauhan <Arvind.Chauhan@....com>,
Linaro Networking <linaro-networking@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 Resend 1/5] tick-common: fix wrong check in tick_check_replacement()
On 16 April 2014 00:12, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> B1;3202;0c
What does this mean ??
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> tick_check_replacement() returns if a replacement of clock_event_device is
>> possible or not. It does this as the first check:
>>
>> if (tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
>> return false;
>>
>> This looks wrong as we are returning false when tick_check_percpu() returned
>> true. Probably Thomas forgot '!' here in his commit: 03e13cf5e ?
>
> Come on. You can do better changelogs.
:(
> "This looks wrong" is definitely not a good description of the
> problem.
>
> Either you know WHY it is wrong, then you say so. If not, then you can
> send an RFC.
>
> I fixed the changelog up this time.
Thanks, will take care of such stuff in future.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists