| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1397669685.19767.450.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org> Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 13:34:45 -0400 From: Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com> To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Daniel Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lpoetter@...hat.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, kay@...hat.com, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PASSCGROUP to enable passing cgroup path On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 10:29 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Then please remove SO_PASSCGROUP. Can you stop demanding changes while demonstrating you haven't well understood the needs, let alone the consequences ? Take a day or 2, put your thoughts together and come back with a clear description of your concerns if you still have any, please. You clearly do not like this proposal, but you can't really articulate why, all I hear at this point are the scratches of nails on the glass wall you are trying to climb. Seriously, if there are reasonable objections we all want to hear them, but they need to be clear and circumstanced. Simo. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists