linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 22:54:50 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
 adding retries

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:34:47PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> > Please don't send new patches as replies in the middle of threads, it
> > makes it confusing trying to work out which versions of things should be
> > applied.

> I'm a little confused about what I did wrong.  Can you give more details?

I'm seeing a reply which looks like it was sent as a followup to Randy's
comment, although now I look at everything together I think that's due
to you sending your new thread in reply to the old thread (that can also
be a problem due to threading either burying the new mail or putting
things in odd places) and my mailer trying to tie the one mail from your
first series that I'd not deleted into the thread.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)