linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=V-2OLVV_H+3HoRAq788tjKSCag9Wydam-bJCdL6VmCDA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:59:10 -0700
From:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
 adding retries

Mark,

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:34:47PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> > Please don't send new patches as replies in the middle of threads, it
>> > makes it confusing trying to work out which versions of things should be
>> > applied.
>
>> I'm a little confused about what I did wrong.  Can you give more details?
>
> I'm seeing a reply which looks like it was sent as a followup to Randy's
> comment, although now I look at everything together I think that's due
> to you sending your new thread in reply to the old thread (that can also
> be a problem due to threading either burying the new mail or putting
> things in odd places) and my mailer trying to tie the one mail from your
> first series that I'd not deleted into the thread.

OK, I'm about to send my v3 of the thread taking Randy's comments
about kernel-doc into account.  I'll explicitly not mark it as
"in-reply-to" the previous thread and hope that solves the problems
you were seeing.

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/