[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <1397719003.7727.24.camel@kjgkr>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:16:43 +0900
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong number of max_nid when init
Hi,
2014-04-17 (목), 14:27 +0800, Chao Yu:
> Since max_nid value was minus three in previous commit:
> 'b63da15e8b475245026bdf2096853683f189706b', Our last three nids could not be
> used ever, but 0/node nid/meta nid is still occupied.
> And also our ra_meta_pages() could not readahead the last block of NAT.
What is the root problem in there?
IIRC, the max_nid should not be turned back since that can cause an
infinite loop during build_free_nids() under a test using whole the
nids.
> Let's fix the wrong calculation of this value, and left the reserved nids there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 84f9b7b..3f0bb50 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> nat_blocks = nat_segs << le32_to_cpu(sb_raw->log_blocks_per_seg);
>
> /* not used nids: 0, node, meta, (and root counted as valid node) */
> - nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks - 3;
> + nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks;
> nm_i->fcnt = 0;
> nm_i->nat_cnt = 0;
> nm_i->ram_thresh = DEF_RAM_THRESHOLD;
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists