[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000001cf5a13$5d8d6620$18a83260$@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 16:01:20 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong number of max_nid when init
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 3:17 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix wrong number of max_nid when init
>
> Hi,
>
> 2014-04-17 (목), 14:27 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Since max_nid value was minus three in previous commit:
> > 'b63da15e8b475245026bdf2096853683f189706b', Our last three nids could not be
> > used ever, but 0/node nid/meta nid is still occupied.
> > And also our ra_meta_pages() could not readahead the last block of NAT.
>
> What is the root problem in there?
The last one is the root problem, I will submit another patch to fix it.
> IIRC, the max_nid should not be turned back since that can cause an
> infinite loop during build_free_nids() under a test using whole the
> nids.
Got it, thanks for your explanation.
Regards.
>
> > Let's fix the wrong calculation of this value, and left the reserved nids there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index 84f9b7b..3f0bb50 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1860,7 +1860,7 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
> > nat_blocks = nat_segs << le32_to_cpu(sb_raw->log_blocks_per_seg);
> >
> > /* not used nids: 0, node, meta, (and root counted as valid node) */
> > - nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks - 3;
> > + nm_i->max_nid = NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK * nat_blocks;
> > nm_i->fcnt = 0;
> > nm_i->nat_cnt = 0;
> > nm_i->ram_thresh = DEF_RAM_THRESHOLD;
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists