[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 02:57:54 -0700
From: tip-bot for Ingo Molnar <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, atodorov@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, jwboyer@...oraproject.org,
qmewlo@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs
Commit-ID: ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:25:53 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:28:42 +0200
x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs
The following commit:
27f6c573e0f7 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")
Added two preemption bugs:
- machine_check_poll() does a get_cpu_var() without a matching
put_cpu_var(), which causes preemption imbalance and crashes upon
bootup.
- it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.
To fix these bugs fix the imbalance and change
cmci_discover_lock to a regular spinlock.
Reported-by: Owen Kibel <qmewlo@...il.com>
Reported-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Todorov <atodorov@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-jtjptvgigpfkpvtQxpEk1at2@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 4 +---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 18 +++++++++---------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c | 4 +---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c | 18 +++++++++---------
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
index eeee23f..68317c8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce.c
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
{
struct mce m;
int i;
- unsigned long *v;
this_cpu_inc(mce_poll_count);
@@ -618,8 +617,7 @@ void machine_check_poll(enum mcp_flags flags, mce_banks_t *b)
if (!(m.status & MCI_STATUS_VAL))
continue;
- v = &get_cpu_var(mce_polled_error);
- set_bit(0, v);
+ this_cpu_write(mce_polled_error, 1);
/*
* Uncorrected or signalled events are handled by the exception
* handler when it is enabled, so don't process those here.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
index 3bdb95a..9a316b2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_intel.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(mce_banks_t, mce_banks_owned);
* cmci_discover_lock protects against parallel discovery attempts
* which could race against each other.
*/
-static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(cmci_discover_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cmci_discover_lock);
#define CMCI_THRESHOLD 1
#define CMCI_POLL_INTERVAL (30 * HZ)
@@ -144,14 +144,14 @@ static void cmci_storm_disable_banks(void)
int bank;
u64 val;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
owned = __get_cpu_var(mce_banks_owned);
for_each_set_bit(bank, owned, MAX_NR_BANKS) {
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
val &= ~MCI_CTL2_CMCI_EN;
wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCx_CTL2(bank), val);
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
}
static bool cmci_storm_detect(void)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
int i;
int bios_wrong_thresh = 0;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < banks; i++) {
u64 val;
int bios_zero_thresh = 0;
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static void cmci_discover(int banks)
WARN_ON(!test_bit(i, __get_cpu_var(mce_poll_banks)));
}
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
if (mca_cfg.bios_cmci_threshold && bios_wrong_thresh) {
pr_info_once(
"bios_cmci_threshold: Some banks do not have valid thresholds set\n");
@@ -316,10 +316,10 @@ void cmci_clear(void)
if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
return;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < banks; i++)
__cmci_disable_bank(i);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
}
static void cmci_rediscover_work_func(void *arg)
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ void cmci_disable_bank(int bank)
if (!cmci_supported(&banks))
return;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
__cmci_disable_bank(bank);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmci_discover_lock, flags);
}
static void intel_init_cmci(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists