[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140417100944.GG11096@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 12:09:44 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, atodorov@...hat.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de,
jwboyer@...oraproject.org, qmewlo@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 02:57:54AM -0700, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Commit-ID: ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ea431643d6c38728195e2c456801c3ef66bb9991
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:25:53 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 10:28:42 +0200
>
> x86/mce: Fix CMCI preemption bugs
>
> The following commit:
>
> 27f6c573e0f7 ("x86, CMCI: Add proper detection of end of CMCI storms")
>
> Added two preemption bugs:
>
> - machine_check_poll() does a get_cpu_var() without a matching
> put_cpu_var(), which causes preemption imbalance and crashes upon
> bootup.
>
> - it does percpu ops without disabling preemption. Preemption is not
> disabled due to the mistaken use of a raw spinlock.
it is arch_spinlock that doesn't disable preemption. raw_spinlock
disables preemption just fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists