[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5351542A.5080307@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:34:50 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC: <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [FIX] dmaengine: virt-dma: Free descriptor after callback
On 04/18/2014 03:50 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 07:56:50PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> Free the vd (virt descriptor) after the callback is called. In EDMA driver
>> atleast which uses virt-dma, we make use of the desc during the callback and if
>> its dangerously freed before the callback is called. I also noticed this in
>> omap-dma dmaengine driver.
>
> You've missed the vital bit of information: why do you make use of the
> descriptor afterwards? You shouldn't. omap-dma doesn't either.
>
> Once clients submit their request to DMA engine, they must not hold any
> kind of reference to the descriptor other than the cookie.
>
Sorry, I confused edma/omap-dma callbacks for virt dma callbacks.
Anyway, I think there is still a chance in edma that we refer to the
echan->edesc pointer later on after virt-dma calls the free (in
edma_execute), so I'll just NULL that out to be safe and submit a patch.
Thanks.
regards,
-Joel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists