linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140418174353.GX12304@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:43:53 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
	ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
	Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
	Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
 adding retries

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs
> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report
> overcurrent).  The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD

This is basically fine but you said it depends on one of the previous
patches which you didn't CC me on so I've no idea what's going on
there?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)