[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VQckC34rZwF2RP3F+2T1CRVs0JwtgoqUeA1NVmB20=sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:05:51 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
AJAY KUMAR RAMAKRISHNA SHYMALAMMA <ajaykumar.rs@...sung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
Michael Spang <spang@...omium.org>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by
adding retries
Mark,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs
>> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report
>> overcurrent). The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD
>
> This is basically fine but you said it depends on one of the previous
> patches which you didn't CC me on so I've no idea what's going on
> there?
Sorry about that. :(
Lee has Acked the caching patch. Lee: what's the best way for you and
Mark to coordinate there? Should he apply the caching patch with your
Ack?
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists