lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 19:52:25 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Allow set voltage on fixed regulators

On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:30:10AM -0700, Tim Kryger wrote:
> If a regulator consumer requests a voltage range that can be satisfied,
> the return value should indicate success even if that regulator has a
> fixed voltage.  Since there is already logic to check if the requested
> voltage range overlaps the allowed range, set REGULATOR_CHANGE_VOLTAGE
> for regulators with constraints that include a positive voltage.

This seems like the wrong place to fix this, it's nothing to do with DT
and we shouldn't require that nonsensical permissions are set.  Instead
we should fix this at the point where we're implementing the permission
check, have the failure case check the current voltage before returning
an error.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ