[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140418115438.1e65e07af17e3ba6d7c554db@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:54:38 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pmladek@...e.cz,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] printk: Add config option for disabling printk
offloading
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:28:15 +0100 Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
> > All the afflicted consoles are serial, all go via the uart layer as far
> > as I can see.
> >
> > The uart layer has a queue mechanism that could be used
> I'm sorry, I don't follow here - what can the uart queueing be used for?
Alan, I'm desperate to avoid adding all this complexity to core printk
code to solve such a rare problem. It'd be great if you could flesh out
any alternative ideas please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists