lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:48:25 -0400
From:	"John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@...il.com>,
	Josh Berkus <josh@...iodbs.com>,
	Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2

>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:

Andrew> On Tue,  8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>> Changelog since v1
>> o topology comment updates
>> 
>> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances
>> punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA
>> node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware
>> and it's routine to see major performance due to zone_reclaim_mode being
>> enabled but relatively few can identify the problem.


This is unclear here.  "see major performance <what> due" doesn't make
sense to me.  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ