[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21329.36761.970643.523119@quad.stoffel.home>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 16:48:25 -0400
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@...il.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@...iodbs.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
Andrew> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
>> Changelog since v1
>> o topology comment updates
>>
>> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances
>> punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA
>> node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware
>> and it's routine to see major performance due to zone_reclaim_mode being
>> enabled but relatively few can identify the problem.
This is unclear here. "see major performance <what> due" doesn't make
sense to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists