[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140420205923.GA23991@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:59:23 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@...il.com>,
Josh Berkus <josh@...iodbs.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@...quadrant.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Disable zone_reclaim_mode by default v2
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:48:25PM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> Andrew> On Tue, 8 Apr 2014 09:22:58 +0100 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> >> Changelog since v1
> >> o topology comment updates
> >>
> >> When it was introduced, zone_reclaim_mode made sense as NUMA distances
> >> punished and workloads were generally partitioned to fit into a NUMA
> >> node. NUMA machines are now common but few of the workloads are NUMA-aware
> >> and it's routine to see major performance due to zone_reclaim_mode being
> >> enabled but relatively few can identify the problem.
>
>
> This is unclear here. "see major performance <what> due" doesn't make
> sense to me.
>
Degradation
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists