[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1397855863.2704.5.camel@adam.happyassassin.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:17:43 -0700
From: Adam Williamson <awilliam@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
mathias.nyman@...el.com,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl-baytrail: fix for irq descriptor conflict on
ASUS T100TA
On Fri, 2014-04-18 at 16:44 -0400, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Jin Yao <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > A crash is triggered on the ASUS T100TA Baytrail-T because of a irq
> > descriptor conflict. There are two gpio triggered acpi events in this
> > device, GPIO 6 and 18. These gpios are translated to irqs by calling
> > gpio_to_irq which in turn will call irq_create_mapping(vg->domain, offset).
> > irq_create_mapping will take care of allocating the irq descriptor, taking
> > the first available number starting from the given value (6 in our case).
> > The 0-15 are already reserved by legacy ISA code, so it gets the first
> > free irq descriptor which is number 16. The i915 driver also uses irq 16,
> > it loads later than gpio and crashes in probe.
> >
> > The bug is reported here:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68291
>
> Adam, the reporter of this bug told me that his touchscreen was broken
> in its tablet.
> I strongly suspect this patch to be the root cause of this, because
> the touchscreen uses i2c_hid. i2c_hid relies on an IRQ declared in the
> DSDT when it is acpi enumerated, and since the inclusion of this
> patch, no irq are triggered from a driver point of view.
>
> Adam should still confirm that the revert of the patch makes the
> touchscreen back alive, but if I understood correctly the bug report,
> without the patch, his tablet oopses at boot.
if IRQ allocation is enabled, yeah. What I can do is test with the
#68291 patch dropped and IRQ allocation disabled in pinctrl-baytrail.c -
as is done in Doug Johnson's patch,
http://dougvj.net/baytrail_gpio_quirk.patch , for #67921 , with these
two blocks:
@@ -532,8 +535,8 @@ static int byt_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed adding byt-gpio chip\n");
return ret;
}
-
/* set up interrupts */
+/*
irq_rc = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0);
if (irq_rc && irq_rc->start) {
hwirq = irq_rc->start;
@@ -548,7 +551,7 @@ static int byt_gpio_probe(struct platform_device
*pdev)
irq_set_handler_data(hwirq, vg);
irq_set_chained_handler(hwirq, byt_gpio_irq_handler);
- }
+ }*/
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
so, I'll do a test of that setup, and see how it goes.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists