[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAYSxhp=oQRpX05dAoxJNyRGXCfpM4EsxUbLz=doVWxWf6bODQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:23:34 -0700
From: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Linux MMC Mailing List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Set ocr_avail directly based on vmmc
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 15 April 2014 19:09, Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> A few times I have suggested to switch to use the
>>> mmc_regulator_get_supply() API to simplify and consolidate code. Could
>>> you please have a look at that?
>>
>> This function will solve my problem but it also suggests that SDHCI
>> drivers should use the vmmc/vqmmc pointers in the mmc_host struct
>> rather than the ones in the sdhci_host struct.
>>
>> Is this your intent? Do you want to see the regulator pointers in the
>> sdhci_host struct removed once all drivers are modified to use the
>> mmc_host ones?
>
> Correct. That will consolidate code!
>
> Then if sdhci has some special needs for regulators, let's first see
> if we can adopt the API to handle it, before we decide to put that
> code in sdhci driver.
Sounds good. Please forget about this patch and consider the new
series instead.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/17/653
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists