[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53552A50.9040005@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:25:20 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
Ganesha NFS List <nfs-ganesha-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
"Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locks: rename file-private locks to file-description
locks
On 04/21/2014 03:45 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
[...]
> - * These cmd values will set locks that conflict with normal POSIX locks, but
> - * are "owned" by the opened file, not the process. This means that they are
> - * inherited across fork() like BSD (flock) locks, and they are only released
> - * automatically when the last reference to the the open file against which
> - * they were acquired is put.
> + * These cmd values will set locks that conflict with process-associated
> + * record locks, but are "owned" by the opened file description, not the
> + * process. This means that they are inherited across fork() like BSD (flock)
> + * locks, and they are only released automatically when the last reference to
> + * the the open file against which they were acquired is put.
(Pre-existing) typo: s/the the/the/
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists