lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHz2CGXzN3OhrjNnJhm_2j=h=y-Te_9yH=WQ4_Hzmco2-G895Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:42:16 +0800
From:	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...hat.com,
	acme@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf-event/cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> How can that field ever be nonzero?
>
> I.e. under what exact circumstances does this patch make sense?

Hi, Ingo,

For cpuset subsystem, this filed is nonzero; for other subsystems, this is zero.
Actually none of these subsystem will change this field,  I just
thought that  this is
a little subtle. as the comment in patches says, this is mainly for
document reason
to inform other maintainers that css_alloc implementation should be
taken care of ,
depending on this field is zero or not.

Thanks,
Jianyu Zhan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ