lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:45:15 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Cc:	Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com,
	linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	backports@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] 6lowpan: add helper to get 6lowpan namespace

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:58 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:

> > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN)
> > > > [...]
> > > > +#else
> > > > +static inline struct netns_ieee802154_lowpan *
> > > > +net_ieee802154_lowpan(struct net *net)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	return NULL;
> > > > +}
> > > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > Why would that be needed? If nobody compiles 802.15.4 then it seems
> > > nothing should reference it?
> > > 
> > Indeed I think this is unnecessary, also.
> 
> I wanted to be sure, and I was not. Right now 6lowpan does not depend
> on CONFIG_NET_NS, is this intentional? I think its fine without it
> but I was not sure.

I fail to see how !CONFIG_LOWPAN is related CONFIG_NET_NS?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists