lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 20:45:15 +0200 From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> Cc: Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>, alex.bluesman.smirnov@...il.com, dbaryshkov@...il.com, linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, backports@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] 6lowpan: add helper to get 6lowpan namespace On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 19:58 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IEEE802154_6LOWPAN) > > > > [...] > > > > +#else > > > > +static inline struct netns_ieee802154_lowpan * > > > > +net_ieee802154_lowpan(struct net *net) > > > > +{ > > > > + return NULL; > > > > +} > > > > +#endif > > > > > > Why would that be needed? If nobody compiles 802.15.4 then it seems > > > nothing should reference it? > > > > > Indeed I think this is unnecessary, also. > > I wanted to be sure, and I was not. Right now 6lowpan does not depend > on CONFIG_NET_NS, is this intentional? I think its fine without it > but I was not sure. I fail to see how !CONFIG_LOWPAN is related CONFIG_NET_NS? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists