[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423072839.GT30677@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:28:39 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de, rjw@...ysocki.net, awilliam@...hat.com,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend Patch 7/9] I2C/ACPI: Add i2c ACPI operation region
support
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:53:21AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> Hi Mika:
> Thanks a lot for your review.
>
> On 2014年04月22日 19:36, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >> > +
> >> > + client.adapter = adapter;
> >> > + client.addr = sb->slave_address;
> >> > + client.flags = 0;
> > I'm not sure if this is the correct way to use struct i2c_client
> > (allocating it from stack and passing forward to functions that might
> > expect a real i2c_client structure). It has ->dev and all.
>
> I check all i2c_smbus_xxx helper functions and they are simple wrappers
> of i2c_smbus_xfer(). Only adapter, addr and flags of struct client are
> used in these functions.
In that case I suppose it is OK to (ab)use the client structure like this.
I think you still want to initialize the whole structure (unused fields
with zero) before passing it to the wrappers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists