[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5357691E.5020007@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:17:50 +0800
From: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
CC: wsa@...-dreams.de, rjw@...ysocki.net, awilliam@...hat.com,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Resend Patch 7/9] I2C/ACPI: Add i2c ACPI operation region support
On 2014年04月23日 15:28, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 09:53:21AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> Hi Mika:
>> Thanks a lot for your review.
>>
>> On 2014年04月22日 19:36, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>>>>> +
>>>>> + client.adapter = adapter;
>>>>> + client.addr = sb->slave_address;
>>>>> + client.flags = 0;
>>> I'm not sure if this is the correct way to use struct i2c_client
>>> (allocating it from stack and passing forward to functions that might
>>> expect a real i2c_client structure). It has ->dev and all.
>>
>> I check all i2c_smbus_xxx helper functions and they are simple wrappers
>> of i2c_smbus_xfer(). Only adapter, addr and flags of struct client are
>> used in these functions.
>
> In that case I suppose it is OK to (ab)use the client structure like this.
>
> I think you still want to initialize the whole structure (unused fields
> with zero) before passing it to the wrappers.
>
Ok. I will do that.
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists