[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140423170418.GA12767@quad>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:04:19 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, venkateshs@...gle.com,
bp@...en8.de, ak@...ux.intel.com, zheng.z.yan@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf/x86: fix RAPL rdmsrl_safe() usage
This patch fixes a bug introduced by commit 24223657.
The rdmsrl_safe() function returns 0 on success.
The current code was failing to detect the RAPL PMU
on real hardware (missing /sys/devices/power) because
the return value of rdmsrl_safe() was misinterpreted.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index 7c87424..619f769 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -543,7 +543,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
if (phys_id < 0)
return -1;
- if (!rdmsrl_safe(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits))
+ /* protect rdmsrl() to handle virtualization */
+ if (rdmsrl_safe(MSR_RAPL_POWER_UNIT, &msr_rapl_power_unit_bits))
return -1;
pmu = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL, cpu_to_node(cpu));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists